Charity
Thomas Sowell on dependence:
LBJ understood the political writings of de Tocqueville very well -- better than most, in fact. Unfortunately for America, he saw in them not the intended warnings, but rather political opportunities. His unbridled lust for power may ultimately be the final torpedo fired into our ship of state, the hit which creates a hole we cannot patch before we sink.
Belief in the superior compassion of the political Left is a worldwide phenomenon that goes back at least as far as the 18th century. But in all that time, and in all those places, there has been little, if any, effort on the left to check this crucial assumption against facts.
When an empirical study of the actual behavior of American conservatives and liberals was published in 2006, it turned out that conservatives donated a larger amount of money, and a higher percentage of their incomes (which were slightly lower than liberal incomes), to philanthropic activities.
Conservatives also donated more of their time to philanthropic activities and donated far more blood than liberals. What is most remarkable about this study are not just its results. What is even more remarkable is how long it took before anyone even bothered to ask the questions. It was just assumed, for centuries, that the Left was more compassionate.
Ronald Reagan donated a higher percentage of his income to charitable activities than did either Franklin D. Roosevelt or Ted Kennedy. Being willing to donate the taxpayers’ money is not the same as being willing to put your own money where your mouth is.
Milton Friedman pointed out that the heyday of free-market capitalism in the 19th century was a period of an unprecedented rise in philanthropic activity. Going even further back in time, in the 18th century Adam Smith, the patron saint of free-market economics, was discovered from records examined after his death to have privately made large charitable donations, far beyond what might have been expected from someone of his income level.
Helping those who have been struck by unforeseeable misfortunes is fundamentally different from making dependency a way of life.
Although the big word on the left is “compassion,” the big agenda on the left is dependency. The more people who are dependent on government handouts, the more votes the Left can depend on for an ever-expanding welfare state.
LBJ understood the political writings of de Tocqueville very well -- better than most, in fact. Unfortunately for America, he saw in them not the intended warnings, but rather political opportunities. His unbridled lust for power may ultimately be the final torpedo fired into our ship of state, the hit which creates a hole we cannot patch before we sink.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home