<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/9924031?origin\x3dhttp://apathycurve.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

Friday, August 27, 2010

I'll buy that for 98¢

I'm trying to decide if this ‘paying kids for good math scores’ idea is monstrous or brilliant. It is private money, after all. In a way, it’s teaching them to be good capitalists – and anything that pisses off leftists is by definition a good thing. But paying the parents? Hrm... maybe not such a good idea.

The submitter makes a strong point against the plan: since it’s only deployed in a small number of schools, the jealousy factor could easily cause the whole bundle of kittens to come unraveled. Kids are humans, after all (though I have to grit my teeth when I admit it); they're quite capable of throwing the test just for spite.

Finally, there's the very strong potential for a Pandora's Box syndrome developing out of the whole idea. So, on the whole, I'm gonna have to go with monstrous.

___
Hat-tip to Shark

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home