<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d9924031\x26blogName\x3dApathy+Curve\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLUE\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://apathycurve.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://apathycurve.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d-8459845989649682690', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe", messageHandlersFilter: gapi.iframes.CROSS_ORIGIN_IFRAMES_FILTER, messageHandlers: { 'blogger-ping': function() {} } }); } }); </script>

Friday, January 30, 2009

Telling numbers

The Liberal media and owners of same just can't seem to wrap their head around why they are losing customers. They say they are putting out a good product yet their share keeps dropping faster than a dress on a drunken prom date. Here is another example of the writing on the wall. These numbers are posted on drudge.

OBAMA BOOM AT FOXNEWS... RATINGS SOAR... NIGHT OF 1/28/09... VIEWERS...

FOXNEWS OREILLY 3,891,000
FOXNEWS HANNITY 3,034,000
FOXNEWS BECK 2,306,000
FOXNEWS SHEP 2,299,000
FOXNEWS GRETA 2,155,000
MSNBC OLBERMANN 1,581,000
CNN COOPER 1,559,000
CNN KING 1,420,000
CNN BLITZER 1,490,000
CNNHN GRACE 1,435,000
MSNBC MADDOW 1,398,000


The lowest Fox program had more than half a million more viewers than the highest competition. Why is that? I think the answer is simple. When Fox is giving an opinion or the show is the opinion of one person, they tell you. You know what you are getting with them. Plus I believe they cover the news and have on differing opinions to discuss topics, not just a centrist pundit and call it balanced.
The MSM make statements like they get thrills up their legs when they hear Obama talk, or they Fawn all over Liberals and call it objective journalism, then get offended when you accuse them of bias.People are finally seeing through the Emperors new clothes at calling what it is. People have a choice today and it scares the hell out of them and liberal politicians. That is why they attack radio talk shows likeRush , and are debating bringing back the (un)fairness doctrine.I think we are in for a long two/four years with the Dems controlling both the congress and White House.
Even though things look bleak for now, I believe that we will see a dramatic change in congress the likes that haven't been seen since 94. I think these numbers show it, and when all these infatuated voters pick their clothes off the floor and do the walk of shame from the hotel room and hope that the Dems will call(but you know they won't) people will vote with their brains and pocket books instead of being wooed by a fancy suit and sweet talk.

1 Comments:

Blogger Jar(egg)head said...

Let CNN and MSNBC keep cheerleading for the left fringe; it'll seal their fates, as it's already done to the New York Times. As the Old Grey Whore circles the drain, millions of dollars in debt and unable to give their rag away in any but the most froth-ridden nests of extreme leftism, the editors continue to insist it's all part of the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy; that their wild-eyed scribblings represent balanced, centrist reporting...

Hey, NYT: The butler did it. In the study. With the knife.

12:47  

Post a Comment

<< Home