<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d9924031\x26blogName\x3dApathy+Curve\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLUE\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://apathycurve.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://apathycurve.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d-8459845989649682690', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe", messageHandlersFilter: gapi.iframes.CROSS_ORIGIN_IFRAMES_FILTER, messageHandlers: { 'blogger-ping': function() {} } }); } }); </script>

Wednesday, July 20, 2005

In Broad Daylight

So it looks like Congress will finally pass the daylight savings time extension. Naturally, though, somebody is upset. No matter what you do, no matter how popular the idea, somebody is going to whine. I'm pretty sure it's a natural law. In this case, it's the PTA and a bunch of fire chiefs.

The PTA:

The Chicago-based National PTA has opposed daylight-saving time for more than 30 years due to safety concerns about kids walking to school in darkness.


Jethro Tull recorded a great song, Living In The Past. Apparently, it's the PTA's anthem. Not only do kids not walk to school anymore, but the busses are actually required to stop at every single house if the little darlings decide they don't want to walk to the corner. God help you if you get behind a school bus in a suburban neighborhood--you may as well just park and wait for an hour.

Besides, if they're not bright enough to stay out of the path of automobiles... Heeeeerrreee's Darwin!

Moving on, the International Association of Fire Chiefs also has a gripe. And if you thought the PTA was being silly... well, you ain't seen nothin' yet:

For years, the International Association of Fire Chiefs has framed a widespread public information campaign around daylight-saving time, reminding people to change the batteries in their smoke and carbon monoxide detectors when they change their clocks. The last weekend in November is too late for the reminder, fire officials say.

"This has been our campaign for years, and across the country...fires are down dramatically, and the use of smoke detectors is one reason for it," said Demarre McGill, deputy fire commissioner for fire prevention.


Okay, this one I'm professionally qualified to comment upon: last time I looked, smoke detectors detect smoke. And where's there's smoke....

If smoke detectors are preventing fires, there's a whole new set of physical laws in operation--and somebody forgot to send me the memo. Again.

Listen up, Mr. McGill: You want to prevent residential fires and associated deaths? Then encourage people to install fire sprinkler systems in their homes. They are 100% effective, and they don't need batteries. You can make a good start by getting together a few burly firemen and beating the snot out of a bunch of insurance lobbyists who have been obstructing residential fire sprinklers for decades. Let me know if you need any help with the beating part.

Most of us don't work one-on-three-off like firemen, and we could care less if kids have to stand on their front porch in the dark while they wait for a school bus to transport their fat asses a quarter mile to their schoolhouse. We slave away in corporate offices ten hours a day, and we need an extra hour of evening light a lot more than a new set of double-A's in our smoke detectors.

So get over it. Congress is doing something useful; that in itself is rare enough to merit applause. Don't screw it up by being whiny little twits.

2 Comments:

Blogger Churt(Elfkind) said...

I don't mind other view points if they at least have a valid point. This article at http://www.nationalreview.com/miller/miller200504010806.asp by John J. Miller at least gives a bit better argument. I don't have real data regardless so can't say which is right.

The statement is true that more lights would be turned on in the morning. However, I can say that people usually have fewer lights on in the morning than in the evening even when it is dark and they are awake. But to what extent that is true I don’t know. Just a guess based off of my own experience. As far as the morning business hurting instead of the evening business I think it may be true but not sure it matters. I believe there's a whole lot more evening business than morning. So even if it does hurt the morning businesses some it would tend to help the economy as a whole. Still, there may be an offset on both points and all factors need to be looked at.

The argument about the AC sounds valid. Which could very well offset the savings from lights in the evening. I think the increase in accidents is probably true as well. It’s only for a couple of days granted but do you want to get plowed into by the extra group of sleepy drivers. And yes, I’m aware they could just go to bed early but you know as well as I that’s not going to happen. And some people are really screwed up by changes to sleep patterns.

Extending daylight savings definitely won’t hurt anything, just not sure if the whole concept is valid when you consider it from all sides. If anyone knows of an actual study with real numbers and all, please let me know.

Later,
N

13:44  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Screw the arguments, I live on the Beach! (well close to the beach)
I can now sit outside and drink Margaritas watching the sun go down all the way through November! This is HUGE!!!

Rep. Ed Markey, D.-Mass, Rep. Fred Upton, R.-Mich Beer is on me!

15:13  

Post a Comment

<< Home