Freedom of speech

Unless muslims find it offensive

NEW YORK – The producers of "South Park" say Comedy Central removed a speech about intimidation and fear from their show after a radical Muslim group warned they could be killed.

The group Revolution Muslim had complained that "South Park" had insulted their prophet by depicting him in a bear costume in last week's episode. The group didn't explictly threaten the producers but warned they could wind up like a Dutch filmmaker killed by a Muslim extremist. The group printed Stone and Parker's work address on its website.

Thats right, they didn't show Mohammad, they just referenced him hiding in a bear suit, but that still was enough to get the muzzys fired up. How did they respond to it?

Comedy Central's "South Park" included a representation of the Prophet Muhammad as a character this week despite a radical Muslim group's warning that its producers could be killed.The message included a gruesome picture of Theo Van Gogh, a Dutch filmmaker murdered by a Muslim extremist in 2004 after making a movie about a woman who rejected Muhammad's teachings. The message said the "South Park" producers would "probably wind up like Theo Van Gogh" for airing the show.

That's right, a follower of the religion of peace killed a man because he made a movie about how violent muslims are.
Now South Park is a truly offensive show and no one is spared. They make fun of EVERYONE, and are about the crudest show on basic cable. They really test our right to free speech, and I applaud them for it. As the saying goes, I may not agree with what you say, but will defend you to the death so you can say it. Yes, Comedy Central is a private entity and can censor anything they put on the air, but show some backbone guys. The second we fear to say or show something, we have lost.
So, to show no fear here goes, Mohammad is an adulterous murderer(it is believed he had one of his friends killed so he could "marry" the mans wife), and pedophile ( he "married" Aisha who was either 6 or 10 years old at the time) To place this man, and yes he was just a man, as a leader and moral compass is idiotic at best. Oh and here is a depiction of him;