<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d9924031\x26blogName\x3dApathy+Curve\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLUE\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://apathycurve.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://apathycurve.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d-8459845989649682690', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe", messageHandlersFilter: gapi.iframes.CROSS_ORIGIN_IFRAMES_FILTER, messageHandlers: { 'blogger-ping': function() {} } }); } }); </script>

Wednesday, July 09, 2008

Ignore the white elephant

Mysterious California Glaciers Keep Growing Despite Warming


You have to love these sentences;

Although Mount Shasta's glaciers are growing, researchers say the 4.7 billion cubic feet of ice on its flanks could be gone by 2100.
The Shasta glaciers have been advancing since the end of a drought in the early 20th century. The mountain's smallest glaciers — named Konwakiton, Watkins and Mud Creek — have more than doubled in length since 1950.


So, lets keep everyone on message, just ignore the data and...

Climate change is causing roughly 90 percent of the world's mountain glaciers to shrink, said Thompson, the Ohio State glacier expert.

"Best that we keep our eye on the big picture," Thompson said in an e-mail about Shasta's unique position. "The picture points unfortunately (to) massive loss of ice on land, which has huge implications for future sea level rise."


It almost seems as if the writer is trying to say that this may be a natural phenomenon, but his editors kept sending him back to make the "proper" corrections until the story said what they wanted it to. Read the whole thing and you will see what I mean.
.

2 Comments:

Blogger Churt(Elfkind) said...

So let me get this straight. Warming causes more CO2 and more water vapor. Water vapor and CO2 trap heat but water vapor also forms clouds and blocks sunlight. The less sunlight hitting the ground the less heat there is to trap. Also, the more clouds the more precipitation. Which means more snow. More snow at the poles and other cold areas means growing ice sheets. Snow and ice have a cooling effect and increased CO2 causes more plants to grow which will soak up the CO2.

Maybe I'm being simplistic here but it looks like, wait for it, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. In other words, this planet has managed to support life for millions of years because of the natural filtering effects that are far more powerful than any effect man kind might have.

Solar variability and tidal forces are the drivers of the earths environment, not mankind.

Right now we have an opportunity to develop our technology and launch mankind to the stars and achieve for the species a level of immortality. But we only have until the sun runs out of fuel and kills every living thing on the planet. So stop this foolishness and lets get cracking on the starships. This may sound like the ravings of a Sci-fi geek (and it is) but it's actually the reality as well. We may not be able to take the planet with us but we can do our best to take as much as we can. If we act now we might even be able to save the platypus.

08:00  
Blogger Jar(egg)head said...

Damn those Republican glaciers! They're screwing up the whole program.

10:01  

Post a Comment

<< Home