Nature may be causing polar ice melt
WASHINGTON - There's more to the recent dramatic and alarming thawing of the Arctic region than can be explained by man-made global warming alone, a new study found.
That can’t be. I thought we were causing Global warming?
New research points a finger at a natural and cyclical increase in the amount of energy in the atmosphere that moves from south to north around the Arctic Circle.
No! Quick, find a study that will contradict this.
But that energy transfer, which comes with storms that head north because of ocean currents, is not acting alone either, scientists say. Another upcoming study concludes that the combination of both that natural energy transfer increase and man-made global warming serve as a one-two punch that is pushing the Arctic over the edge.
OK, good start, but not enough, they have more…
Scientists are trying to figure out why the Arctic is warming and melting faster than computer models predict.
Find someone we can quote that sounds scientific like so our readers don’t fall for this “Nature, causing Global warming” thing.
Rune Graversen, the Nature study co-author and a meteorology researcher at Stockholm University in Sweden, said a shift in energy transfer explains the thawing more, including what's happening in the atmosphere, but does not contradict consensus global warming science.
"If we didn't have the little extra kick from global warming then we wouldn't have gone past the threshold for the change in sea ice," said Overland, of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's lab in Seattle.
Whew! That was a close one.
1 Comments:
What I find most depressing is the fact that Nature magazine is preaching the anthropogenic global warming myth. Not very long ago, it was considered the most authoritative publicly distributed scientific journal in the world. Now, like Scientific American before them, its editors have descended to the level of broadsheet hacks.
Very sad. But, as a friend pointed out to me years ago, that's the problem you run into with ad-supported scientific mags: their objectivity is directly tied to their pocketbook.
Post a Comment
<< Home