Global warming Marxism
But, Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin reports, Vladimir Putin's personal economic adviser, Andrei Illarionov, said last summer Russia's approval of Kyoto came under severe duress – an "all-out and total war on Russia" directed by Blair. He said the pressure included "bribes, blackmail and murder threats."
Can't we talk about this?
Illarionov said global warming advocates refused to answer questions posed to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change at a Moscow symposium. He claimed British science advisers tried to stop skeptics from being heard.
Illarionov said "none of the assertions made in the Kyoto Protocol and the 'scientific' theory on which it is based have been borne out by actual data. ... There is no evidence confirming a positive linkage between the level of carbon dioxide and temperature change. If there is such a linkage, it is of a reverse nature. ... The statistical data ... are often considerably distorted if not falsified."
While some in the U.S. have offered sharp criticism of the ideology driving the global warming crusade, none of the rhetoric has been as penetrating as Illarionov's, who compared it "with man-hating totalitarian ideology with which we had the bad fortune to deal during the 20th century, such as National Socialism (and) Marxism."
Apparently not. There can be no discussion about Global warming, just do as we say. But wait, we come to the true heart of the matter.
Under the Kyoto Protocol, undeveloped Third-World nations – including China, India, Brazil and Mexico – will be free to produce whatever they want. Yet 82 percent of the projected emissions growth in future years will come from these countries. This is why many critics see is global wealth redistribution scheme rather than a real plan to improve the environment.
Really?
He predicts international corporations, "who owe allegiance to no nation, will bolt America and move their factories, lock, stock, and computer chip to those Third World countries where they will be free to carry on production. But that means the same emissions will be coming out of the jungles of South America instead of Chicago. So where is the protection of the environment? You see, it's not about that, is it?"
DUH!
He points out that hidden in the small print of the treaty is a provision that calls for the "harmonizing of patent laws."
"Now, robbing a nation of its patent protection is an interesting tactic for protecting the environment, don't you think?" he adds.
posted by davis14633 at 07:43
3 Comments:
Haven't you heard?? Al Gore said officially that the debate on Global Warming is over. The Pope of The Church of Environmentalism has spoken, any conflicting opinion is heresy, and new or conflicting evidence is blasphemy or a deception of Satan (i.e. Industry) and his minions (i.e. Capitalists).
You've obviously made the mistaken assumption that Global Warming(tm) is rooted in science (which is based on continual testing, challenge, review and open to change) as opposed to dogma
I apologize and have been shown the error of my ways. I will repent and begin the immediate purchase of carbon credits from AlGoreco. a subsidiary of U.N. corp.
It's a rare event that I find myself in total and complete agreement with a Russian, but this is one of those times.
It's an interesting contrast that Russian scientists tend to be virtually immune to the sort of self-delusion which often permeates academia-based scientific research in the West. Perhaps it comes from having to deal with such extreme delusion, corruption and backstabbing in their political establishment -- an equal and opposite reaction, so to speak.
Post a Comment
<< Home