Encore! Encore!

The RIAA was bitch-slapped yesterday by an Oklahoma judge:

In his ruling, Judge West found that the RIAA had asserted an untested and marginal theory that veered toward "frivolous and unreasonable" by suing Foster for contributory and vicarious copyright infringement when the only evidence against her was her name on the household Internet account.

Finding that in the face of these claims, "her only alternative to litigating ... was to capitulate to a settlement for a violation she insists she did not commit" and that "[s]uch capitulation would not advance the aims of the Copyright Act," the Court awarded Ms. Foster her attorneys fees and costs.

Bravo! Now do it again. And again. As many times as it takes to make the RIAA understand that the courts do not exist for the purpose of supporting their defunct business model extortion racket.